Herramientas de usuario

Herramientas del sitio


proyectos:tfg:casos:ciencias_de_la_salud:start

Diferencias

Muestra las diferencias entre dos versiones de la página.

Enlace a la vista de comparación

Ambos lados, revisión anteriorRevisión previa
Próxima revisión
Revisión previa
proyectos:tfg:casos:ciencias_de_la_salud:start [2018/01/19 16:00] – [Medicina basada en evidencia] Joaquín Herrero Pintadoproyectos:tfg:casos:ciencias_de_la_salud:start [2019/04/16 16:02] (actual) – [Novedades] Joaquín Herrero Pintado
Línea 1: Línea 1:
 ====== Causalidad en ciencias de la salud ====== ====== Causalidad en ciencias de la salud ======
  
 +
 +
 +===== Novedades =====
 +
 +[[https://www.amazon.es/Causality-Probability-Medicine-English-Gillies-ebook/dp/B07GRCNCT7/ref=sr_1_1?__mk_es_ES=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&keywords=causality+probability+medicine&qid=1554112038&s=gateway&sr=8-1|Causality, Probability, and Medicine]], Donald Gillies
 +
 +  * [[http://www.thebsps.org/2019/04/anjum-on-gillies/|Reseña del libro]], por Ranil Lill Anjum
 +
 +{{:proyectos:tfg:casos:ciencias_de_la_salud:anjum2018.pdf|Medical scientists and philosophers worldwide appeal to EBM to expand the notion of 'evidence'}}
  
 ===== Bibliografía ===== ===== Bibliografía =====
  
 +  * [[infocomp:metabiologia|]]
   * [[proyectos:tfg:bibliografia:anjum2011]]   * [[proyectos:tfg:bibliografia:anjum2011]]
   * [[http://thebjps.typepad.com/my-blog/2016/11/causation-in-scientific-methods.html|Anjum, R.L., Causation in Scientific Methods (2016)]]   * [[http://thebjps.typepad.com/my-blog/2016/11/causation-in-scientific-methods.html|Anjum, R.L., Causation in Scientific Methods (2016)]]
Línea 16: Línea 26:
     * [[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.12578/abstract|A philosophical argument against evidence-based policy]] (pages 1045–1050), Rani Lill Anjum and Stephen D Mumford     * [[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.12578/abstract|A philosophical argument against evidence-based policy]] (pages 1045–1050), Rani Lill Anjum and Stephen D Mumford
  
-===== Medicina basada en evidencia =====+http://extendedevolutionarysynthesis.com/getting-into-the-weeds-individual-plasticity-and-adaptive-variation/ 
 + 
 +https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322836323_Everything_Flows_Towards_a_Processual_Philosophy_of_Biology 
 + 
 + 
 +==== Biología sintética vs. Biología evolutiva ==== 
 + 
 +http://isegoria.revistas.csic.es/index.php/isegoria/article/view/948 
 + 
 + 
 +===== La Medicina Basada en Evidencia implica una ontología de la causalidad =====
  
-Rani Lill Anjum: "the more common view is Evidence based medicine (EBM) in methodology plus some person centered healthcare (PCH) in practice. Philosophically, however, I try to show that it also depends on it how we think about causation, probability & complexity. If probabilities are understood as singular and property based (propensities) methodology wouldn’t favour statistical averages (or frequencies). So in that sense ontology can motivate scientific methods & interpretations of results. Contrary to the Standard Probability Theory ((Any standard logistic regression model with a continuous covariate can issue a separate probability for each patient. It's a commonplace of frequentist statistics. Stephen John Senn on [[https://twitter.com/stephensenn/status/953345983051640836|Twitter]])), in the #CauSciBook we argue for a dispositionalist propensity singularist understanding of probability." [[https://twitter.com/ranilillanjum/status/953341808767102976|Twitter thread]]+Rani Lill Anjum: "the more common view is Evidence based medicine (EBM) in methodology plus some person centered healthcare (PCH) in practice. Philosophically, however, I try to show that it also depends on it how we think about causation, probability & complexity. If probabilities are understood as singular and property based (propensities) methodology wouldn’t favour statistical averages (or frequencies). So in that sense ontology can motivate scientific methods & interpretations of results. Contrary to the Standard Probability Theory ((Any standard logistic regression model with a continuous covariate can issue a separate probability for each patient. It's a commonplace of frequentist statistics. Stephen John Senn on [[https://twitter.com/stephensenn/status/953345983051640836|Twitter]])), in the #CauSciBook we argue for a **dispositionalist propensity singularist understanding of probability**." [[https://twitter.com/ranilillanjum/status/953341808767102976|Twitter thread]]
  
 ==== Bibliografía ==== ==== Bibliografía ====
Línea 64: Línea 84:
   * [[https://sites.google.com/site/ranilillanjum/home/research/causation-in-science|Mumford, S, Anjum, R.L., Causation in Science (forthcoming) (abstracts available)]]   * [[https://sites.google.com/site/ranilillanjum/home/research/causation-in-science|Mumford, S, Anjum, R.L., Causation in Science (forthcoming) (abstracts available)]]
  
 +Ver [[proyectos:tfg:causalidad:causcibook|]]
  
 ===== Proyecto CauseHealth ===== ===== Proyecto CauseHealth =====
proyectos/tfg/casos/ciencias_de_la_salud/start.1516377649.txt.gz · Última modificación: por Joaquín Herrero Pintado