proyectos:tfg:introduccion:realismo-especulativo
Diferencias
Muestra las diferencias entre dos versiones de la página.
| Próxima revisión | Revisión previa | ||
| proyectos:tfg:introduccion:realismo-especulativo [2017/12/13 08:33] – creado Joaquín Herrero Pintado | proyectos:tfg:introduccion:realismo-especulativo [2022/06/03 08:44] (actual) – Joaquín Herrero Pintado | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
| - | ====== Realismo | + | ====== Realismo |
| - | ====== Antecedentes: | + | [[proyectos: |
| + | [[proyectos: | ||
| + | [[proyectos: | ||
| + | [[proyectos: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Antecedentes | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anton Amo (c1703-55), who was born and died in Guinea, today’s Ghana. For two decades, Amo studied and taught at Germany’s foremost universities, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Amo was born a century after Yacob. He seems to have been kidnapped from the Akan people and the coastal city of Axim as a young boy, possibly for slavery, before being brought via Amsterdam to the court of Duke Anton Ulrich of Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel. Amo was baptised in 1707, and he received a very high-standard education, learning Hebrew, Greek, Latin, French, High and Low German, in addition to probably knowing some of his mother tongue, Nzema. The great polymath G W Leibniz (1646-1716) frequently visited Amo’s home in Wolfenbüttel when he was growing up. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In Amo’s most thorough work, The Art of Philosophising Soberly and Accurately (1738), he seems to anticipate the later Enlightenment thinker Kant. The book deals with the intentions of our mind, and with human actions as natural, rational or in accordance with a norm. In the first chapter, writing in Latin, Amo argues that ‘everything knowable is either a thing in itself, or a sensation, or an operation of the mind’. | ||
| + | |||
| + | He elaborates in the next paragraph, stating that ‘for the sake of which cognition occurs, is the thing in itself’. And in the following demonstration: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Today, Kant is known for his notion of the ‘thing-in-itself’ (das Ding an sich) in Critique of Pure Reason (1787) – and his argument that we cannot know the thing beyond our mental representation of it. Yet it is acknowledged that this was not the first use of the term in Enlightenment philosophy. As the Merriam-Webster Dictionary writes on the term thing-in-itself: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | --- [[https:// | ||
| + | ====== El anti-realismo continental, | ||
| ===== Lee Braver ===== | ===== Lee Braver ===== | ||
| Línea 9: | Línea 28: | ||
| >This paper explains the nature and origin of what I am calling Transgressive Realism, a middle path between realism and anti-realism which tries to combine their strengths while avoiding their weaknesses. Kierkegaard created the position by merging Hegel’s insistence that we must have some kind of contact with anything we can call real (thus rejecting noumena), with Kant’s belief that reality fundamentally exceeds our understanding; | >This paper explains the nature and origin of what I am calling Transgressive Realism, a middle path between realism and anti-realism which tries to combine their strengths while avoiding their weaknesses. Kierkegaard created the position by merging Hegel’s insistence that we must have some kind of contact with anything we can call real (thus rejecting noumena), with Kant’s belief that reality fundamentally exceeds our understanding; | ||
| + | |||
| ====== El giro especulativo ====== | ====== El giro especulativo ====== | ||
| Línea 133: | Línea 153: | ||
| * [[http:// | * [[http:// | ||
| * [[http:// | * [[http:// | ||
| - | * [[http://www.revistaenie.clarin.com/ | + | * [[https:// |
| * [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
| * [[http:// | * [[http:// | ||
proyectos/tfg/introduccion/realismo-especulativo.1513153989.txt.gz · Última modificación: por Joaquín Herrero Pintado