xx:antecedentes
Diferencias
Muestra las diferencias entre dos versiones de la página.
| Ambos lados, revisión anteriorRevisión previaPróxima revisión | Revisión previa | ||
| xx:antecedentes [2018/01/16 14:50] – [Bergson] Joaquín Herrero Pintado | xx:antecedentes [2018/01/22 11:08] (actual) – [Bibliografía] Joaquín Herrero Pintado | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Línea 61: | Línea 61: | ||
| Como indica John Abromeit en //Marx Horkheimer and the foundation of the Frankfurt School// (2011, New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 134) : | Como indica John Abromeit en //Marx Horkheimer and the foundation of the Frankfurt School// (2011, New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 134) : | ||
| - | >//Husserl had subordinated science to philosophy, but he still considered philosoophy to be a logically rigorous and strictly theoretical undertaking. Bergson, in contrast, rejected all forms of conceptual knowledge as inadequate for the purpose of understanding reality. For Bergson, all forms of conceptual knowledge, including science, do not reveal to us the way things are “in themselves, | + | >Husserl had subordinated science to philosophy, but he still considered philosoophy to be a logically rigorous and strictly theoretical undertaking. Bergson, in contrast, rejected all forms of conceptual knowledge as inadequate for the purpose of understanding reality. For Bergson, all forms of conceptual knowledge, including science, do not reveal to us the way things are “in themselves, |
| ===== Bibliografía ===== | ===== Bibliografía ===== | ||
| Línea 69: | Línea 69: | ||
| Bergson, H., La evolución creadora, en "Obras escogidas", | Bergson, H., La evolución creadora, en "Obras escogidas", | ||
| Safranski, R., Schopenhauer y los años salvajes de la filosofía, Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 1991.\\ | Safranski, R., Schopenhauer y los años salvajes de la filosofía, Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 1991.\\ | ||
| + | Ballesteros, | ||
xx/antecedentes.1516114200.txt.gz · Última modificación: por Joaquín Herrero Pintado
