Herramientas de usuario
proyectos:tfg:casos:ciencias_de_la_salud:start
Diferencias
Muestra las diferencias entre dos versiones de la página.
| Ambos lados, revisión anterior Revisión previa Próxima revisión | Revisión previa | ||
|
proyectos:tfg:casos:ciencias_de_la_salud:start [2018/01/19 16:02] Joaquín Herrero Pintado [Medicina basada en evidencia] |
proyectos:tfg:casos:ciencias_de_la_salud:start [2019/04/16 16:02] Joaquín Herrero Pintado [Novedades] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
| ====== Causalidad en ciencias de la salud ====== | ====== Causalidad en ciencias de la salud ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Novedades ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https://www.amazon.es/Causality-Probability-Medicine-English-Gillies-ebook/dp/B07GRCNCT7/ref=sr_1_1?__mk_es_ES=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&keywords=causality+probability+medicine&qid=1554112038&s=gateway&sr=8-1|Causality, Probability, and Medicine]], Donald Gillies | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[http://www.thebsps.org/2019/04/anjum-on-gillies/|Reseña del libro]], por Ranil Lill Anjum | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:proyectos:tfg:casos:ciencias_de_la_salud:anjum2018.pdf|Medical scientists and philosophers worldwide appeal to EBM to expand the notion of 'evidence'}} | ||
| ===== Bibliografía ===== | ===== Bibliografía ===== | ||
| + | * [[infocomp:metabiologia|]] | ||
| * [[proyectos:tfg:bibliografia:anjum2011]] | * [[proyectos:tfg:bibliografia:anjum2011]] | ||
| * [[http://thebjps.typepad.com/my-blog/2016/11/causation-in-scientific-methods.html|Anjum, R.L., Causation in Scientific Methods (2016)]] | * [[http://thebjps.typepad.com/my-blog/2016/11/causation-in-scientific-methods.html|Anjum, R.L., Causation in Scientific Methods (2016)]] | ||
| Línea 16: | Línea 26: | ||
| * [[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.12578/abstract|A philosophical argument against evidence-based policy]] (pages 1045–1050), Rani Lill Anjum and Stephen D Mumford | * [[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.12578/abstract|A philosophical argument against evidence-based policy]] (pages 1045–1050), Rani Lill Anjum and Stephen D Mumford | ||
| - | ===== Medicina basada en evidencia ===== | + | http://extendedevolutionarysynthesis.com/getting-into-the-weeds-individual-plasticity-and-adaptive-variation/ |
| + | |||
| + | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322836323_Everything_Flows_Towards_a_Processual_Philosophy_of_Biology | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Biología sintética vs. Biología evolutiva ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | http://isegoria.revistas.csic.es/index.php/isegoria/article/view/948 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== La Medicina Basada en Evidencia implica una ontología de la causalidad ===== | ||
| Rani Lill Anjum: "the more common view is Evidence based medicine (EBM) in methodology plus some person centered healthcare (PCH) in practice. Philosophically, however, I try to show that it also depends on it how we think about causation, probability & complexity. If probabilities are understood as singular and property based (propensities) methodology wouldn’t favour statistical averages (or frequencies). So in that sense ontology can motivate scientific methods & interpretations of results. Contrary to the Standard Probability Theory ((Any standard logistic regression model with a continuous covariate can issue a separate probability for each patient. It's a commonplace of frequentist statistics. Stephen John Senn on [[https://twitter.com/stephensenn/status/953345983051640836|Twitter]])), in the #CauSciBook we argue for a **dispositionalist propensity singularist understanding of probability**." [[https://twitter.com/ranilillanjum/status/953341808767102976|Twitter thread]] | Rani Lill Anjum: "the more common view is Evidence based medicine (EBM) in methodology plus some person centered healthcare (PCH) in practice. Philosophically, however, I try to show that it also depends on it how we think about causation, probability & complexity. If probabilities are understood as singular and property based (propensities) methodology wouldn’t favour statistical averages (or frequencies). So in that sense ontology can motivate scientific methods & interpretations of results. Contrary to the Standard Probability Theory ((Any standard logistic regression model with a continuous covariate can issue a separate probability for each patient. It's a commonplace of frequentist statistics. Stephen John Senn on [[https://twitter.com/stephensenn/status/953345983051640836|Twitter]])), in the #CauSciBook we argue for a **dispositionalist propensity singularist understanding of probability**." [[https://twitter.com/ranilillanjum/status/953341808767102976|Twitter thread]] | ||
| Línea 64: | Línea 84: | ||
| * [[https://sites.google.com/site/ranilillanjum/home/research/causation-in-science|Mumford, S, Anjum, R.L., Causation in Science (forthcoming) (abstracts available)]] | * [[https://sites.google.com/site/ranilillanjum/home/research/causation-in-science|Mumford, S, Anjum, R.L., Causation in Science (forthcoming) (abstracts available)]] | ||
| + | Ver [[proyectos:tfg:causalidad:causcibook|]] | ||
| ===== Proyecto CauseHealth ===== | ===== Proyecto CauseHealth ===== | ||
proyectos/tfg/casos/ciencias_de_la_salud/start.txt · Última modificación: 2019/04/16 16:02 por Joaquín Herrero Pintado
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, el contenido de este wiki esta bajo la siguiente licencia: CC Attribution 4.0 International
